Saturday, April 13, 2013

Pop Music: the Most Insidious Form of Capitalist Brainwashing


Remember that the media have two basic functions. One is to indoctrinate the elites, to make sure they have the right ideas and know how to serve power. In fact, typically the elites are the most indoctrinated segment of a society, because they are the ones who are exposed to the most propaganda and actually take part in the decision-making process. For them you have the New York Times, and the Washington Post, and the Wall Street Journal, and so on.  
But there’s also a mass media, whose main function is just to get rid of the rest of the population—to marginalize and eliminate them, so they don’t interfere with decision-making. And the press that’s designed for that purpose isn’t the New York Times and the Washington Post, it’s sitcoms on television, and the National Enquirer, and sex and violence, and babies with three heads, and football, all that kind of stuff.    
But the approximately 85 percent of the population that is the main target of that media, they don’t have it in their genes that they’re not interested in the way the world works. And if they can escape from the effects of the de-education and indoctrination system, and the whole class system it’s a part of—it’s after all not just indoctrination that keeps people from getting involved in political life, by any means—if they can do that, then yeah, they’re a big audience for an alternative, and there’s some hope.

Although Chomsky never acknowledges him, long before him, Theodor Adorno had written:

The entire world is being steered by the filter of the culture industry.

Die ganze Welt wird durch das Filter der Kulturindistrie geleitet. 
My own translation from p146 of the volume of Adorno's complete works: Hockheimer & Adorno: Dialektik der Aufklärung. Kulturindustrie—Aufklärung als Massenbetrug. (The Dialectic of Enlightenment. The culture industry as mass deception). Suhrkamp Taschenbuch.

Further "stuff"—commodities—identified by Theodor Adorno as a one of the items peddled by the culture industry is that of pop music. This is arguably the most insidious of all forms of brainwashing, of dumbing down, and anaesthetising of the sensibilities of the populace. By pop music I mean a great deal of different pseudo-genres that masquerade under different names, but really are like different brand-names of soap.

The primary aim of the culture industry capitalist propaganda machine is to force people to conform to its dumbed down aesthetics, which are the aesthetics of the "cool". There is a constant attempt to make every form of violence, explosion of hatred, and insipid drug taking to appear "cool". When that seems passé, they are back to peddling good old fashioned kitsch again under the guise of it being a more virgin and wholesome commodity. They have even managed to brainwash the mass consumer into firmly believing that their product is somehow modern.






Adorno comments on a quotation from Tocqueville on the social ostracisation that befalls whoever fails to conform to the "cool aesthetics" as dictated by the culture industry:

"The ruler no longer says there: thou shalt think like me or die. He says: You are free not to think as I do, your life, your property, everything shall remains yours, but from this day on you are a stranger among us". Whoever fails to conform is struck with an economic impotence that goes on in the spirit of the maverick.
"Der Herrscher sagt dort nicht mehr: du sollst denken wie ich oder sterben. Er sagt: es steht dir frei, nicht zu denken wie ich, dein Leben, deine Güter, alles soll dir bleiben, aber von diesem Tage an bist du ein Fremdling unter uns". Was nicht konformiert, wird mit einer ökonomischen Ohnmacht geschlagen, die sich in der geistigen des Eigenbrötlers fortsetzt.   
My own translation from p155 of the volume of Adorno's complete works: Hockheimer & Adorno: Dialektik der Aufklärung. Kulturindustrie—Aufklärung als Massenbetrug. (The Dialectic of Enlightenment. The culture industry as mass deception). Suhrkamp Taschenbuch.

The first and most fundamental subconscious indoctrination involves teaching children at a young age that if they fail to listen to pop music they will be forever shunned by society. Once the spirit is broken by capitulation to the "cool aesthetic", other forms of culture industry capitalist indoctrination rapidly follow suit, where:

To be entertained is to have consented. It is possible in so far as it encompasses with it the totality of all social processes. It makes one stupid and from the beginning of even the most trivial work, the inescapable demand absurdly divulges itself: to reflect in the limitation of the whole thing. Pleasure is always: not to have to forget suffering, even where it is shown. Impotence lies at its very essence. It is indeed escape, but not, as it claims, escape from awful reality, but from the last contemplation of the resistance, which it has left behind.

Vergnügtsein heißt Einverstandensein. Es ist möglich nur, indem es sich gegenüber dem Ganzen des gesellschaftlichen Prozesses abdichtet, dumm macht und von Anbeginn den unentrinnbaren Anspruch jedes Werks, selbst des nichtigsten, widersinnig preisgibt: in seiner Beschränkung des Ganzes zu reflektieren. Vergnügen heißt allemal: nicht daran denken müssen, das Leiden vergessen, noch wo es gezeigt wird. Ohnmacht liegt ihm zu Grunde. Es ist in der Tat Flucht, aber nicht, wie es behauptet, Flucht vor der schlechten Realität, sondern vor dem letzten Gedanken an Widerstand, den jene noch übriggelassen hat.  
My own translation from p167 from the volume of Adorno's complete works: Hockheimer & Adorno: Dialektik der Aufklärung. Kulturindustrie—Aufklärung als Massenbetrug. (The Dialectic of Enlightenment. The culture industry as mass deception). Suhrkamp Taschenbuch.

Or to put it in the words of Noam Chomsky:

But entertainment has the merit not only of being better suited to helping sell goods; it is an effective vehicle for hidden ideological messages. Furthermore, in a system of high and growing inequality, entertainment is the contemporary equivalent of the Roman "games of the circus" that diverts the public from politics and generates a political apathy that is helpful to preservation of the status quo.  

It is a circus where in swooning over kitsch, there often springs to life a surreptitious, yet equally vast and oppressive kitsch onto-theology:

Especially for you the birds are singin'/ Especially for you the bells are ringin'. We are even told that the teleology of mass produced goods can explain the existence of sun, moon and stars: 'Especially for you that's what a moon's for/ Especially for that what a June's for.' The cynicism has a precise function. By telling the consumer that he cannot meddle with the product he is given over to the understanding that the producer takes no more cognisance of his needs than the moon takes of the dog that barks at it, he is meant to realise that he is being mocked...The sound of laughter we heard is familiar to us from the radio where the announcer not only laughs, but laughs at his own laughter defrauding the listener of the very deception which is being perpetuated against him. The customer knows full well that his wisest course is to affiliate with this institutional laughter. He realises that, whatever he does, he has no choice but to obey... 
My translation from Musikalische Warenanalysen (Analysis of Commodity Music) p285. Musikalische Schriften III complete works Suhrkamp Taschenbuch. Based partly on Rodney Livingstone's translation in Quasi una Fantasia

We are expected to have an unquestioning religious faith in this commodity-fetish, to become perfectly dumbed down, and unthinking sheepish followers of its capitalist doctrines with its oppressive metaphysic of the "cool", where the most successful commodity-people are accorded cosmological significance by being designated as "stars".



Post-Script


For those of you who have exploded with outrage at this post—too bad. If you have popped an aneurysm at reading this or any other post here, you came here at your own risk, and I take no responsibility for any convulsions that this or any other post may have induced. There are plenty of blogs out there presenting a constant stream of mild and inoffensive viewpoints to please and apease you. If you come here, expect to be provoked into thinking. In any case, I am not going to take heed of anyone who wishes to lecture me that I should immediately cease and desist from blaspheming against pop music and the capitalist culture industry. So don't even bother making any comments to that effect.



Further Reading:


Adorno on Popular Culture by Robert W. Witkin. A highly readable introduction to the subject matter.



Also available directly from Routledge.

For a more general introduction to Adorno's highly critical brand of post-Marxist (utterly heretical to classical Marxists) thought I suggest reading Gerhard Schweppenhäuser's book.

Noam Chomsky: Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. Chomsky is always an engaging and readable writer, whereas Adorno is well known for often being more complex and opaque.

6 comments:

  1. I need to go to bed - its been a long night. But will get back to this later tomorrow. However, based on your opening paragraph - and believing that you are a Jungian - do you consider Capitalism to be a form of Egregore rather than a movement purposefully driven by, admittedly small, external forces to itself? Or are you thinking of it in a more traditional Marxist way? Which may be the same-thing - I remain undecided.

    I make reference to "In fact, typically the elites are the most indoctrinated segment of a society, because they are the ones who are exposed to the most propaganda and actually take part in the decision-making process. For them you have the New York Times, and the Washington Post, and the Wall Street Journal, and so on. " Simply curious. You know me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Keep in mind that Adorno is not a traditional Marxist at all, but a highly critical post-Marxist. I am a post-Jungian, he is a post-Freudian. Adorno's idea that modern capitalism is driven to by the overwhelming influence of market driven media forces and by propaganda (the euphemism today is "public relations") is itself already deeply heretical to classical Marxists, and one can argue endleslys if this entails a shift in the definition of capitalism itself or if we live a post/neo-capitalist landscape different to that of the post-industrial revolution world of Marx.

    If should be emphasised that Adorno dismissed communism as another form of fascism. That's why I find Adorno fascinating, especially as someone who was, for a long time, dismissive of classical Marxism. As someone who saw the rise of National Socialism in his homeland, Adorno saw the extraordinary power of propaganda and the media in controlling a people. Today, the techniques used in "public relations" are far more subtle and infinitely more powerful than anything the National Socialists ever dreamt of in their wildest dreams. So subtle is it that they no longer announce themselves as the Ministry of Propaganda as Goebbels did. The National Socialists were but neophytes in manipulating the media. Even the war on Iraq was launched on primetime TV as a staged media event.

    For more by Chomsky on the role of the media in rule by propaganda see "Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media."

    http://www.amazon.com/Manufacturing-Consent-Political-Economy-ebook/dp/B003IQ16EW/

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks Sator - I really do look forward to reading this in much detail later but at the moment I am staying awake by pure willpower - and a mixture of Haitink's Siegfried and (I would suspect to your disgust :))Saxons new Cd - but that is another topic. I am thus tired and may be misreading your reply, but think you may have missed my rather simplistic question.

    Do you perceive these "media forces" to be "orchestrated" by some "group" internal to capitalism or has capitalism now reached a state where it is "driving itself"? Hence my notion of Eregore? I mention this because of your comment regarding " the media have two basic functions. One is to indoctrinate the elites, to make sure they have the right ideas and know how to serve power."

    It would suggest: a "super elite" that drives the media in this process, existing "elites" making sure the "status quo" within its own "off spring" is maintained or alternatively a media that it self is "working" for a form of "Eregore" called Capitalism that has taken on a form of "self serving consciousness" all of its own? (There are of course I know, alternative views especially within "neo-Marxism" but I do not detect this in your discussion). I may be over simplifying things here - it is alas my nature.

    Thanks for the Chomsky recommendation by the way, but I have read it, as I have a few other bits of Chomsky work. I am alas, a genuine, honest to goodness anarchist - so how could I have not. A copy of the Zhuangzi is never far away. Or does that make me an "neo-anarchist"? Oh well. I am sure you know what I mean

    ReplyDelete
  4. Adorno thought that the classical devision between bourgeoisie and proletariate were no longer valid in our (post)-capitalist world. That is that idea that there was simple group that formed an simplistic oppressing aristocracy itself was no longer valid. I tend to agree. The insight came from Adorno observing the rise of National Socialism in his own country, and how it shattered the naive Marxist dream of imminent Utopia. Instead he lived through an Orwellian nightmare before escaping it (as a Jew) to the US only to be swamped in the sheer overwhelming sophistication of the slick American media machine. Is this truly much better than what I have just escaped?—that was Adorno's deep insight. To him it seemed so uncannily similar in the way it used media to manipulate that it was creepy.

    People that became Nazis came from all works of life, from workers to the aristocracy. Adorno's insight was that the entire process of (post)-capitalism is a structural juggernaut bigger than an particular person, group of individuals or classes. We are all caught up in it, stuck in it's tentacles, often subconsciously so. For that is how the media machine works...insidiously and subconsciously. That's where Freud enters in Adorno.

    ReplyDelete
  5. BTW I should also say that I don't mind Haitink's Ring at all. Not at all. He is a very intelligent Wagnerian.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ah! I see. Jung also? And in a sense we come full circle - in part - back to Wotan and Alberich? I was not a million miles out with an Eregore then? In a sense.

    Glad you like Haitink's Wagner. I would agree completely with your thoughts. I am also something of a fan of his Beethoven Cycle with LSO. Although, I note that seems to be going "out of fashion" again.

    ReplyDelete